The tension between tech billionaire Elon Musk and the popular talk show The View has exploded into a lawsuit that has caused a stir in international public opinion.

Elon Musk kiện một nhóm quảng cáo vì đã gỡ quảng cáo khỏi X.

This incident has not only attracted the attention of the media but also sparked fierce debates about freedom of speech, the legal responsibility of the media and the influence of celebrities in modern society.
Controversial statements on television

The lawsuit originated from a number of broadcasts of The View, where veteran hosts such as Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg made statements that were considered defamatory and distorted information about Elon Musk.

Specifically, they accused Musk of manipulating the stock market, abusing the power of the media to manipulate public opinion and making negative comments about him personally.

These statements immediately spread on social media, creating a wave of criticism, ridicule and even directly affecting the stock prices of Tesla and SpaceX – two corporations run by Musk.

Joy Behar | Tin tức và cập nhật của Joy Behar | TMZ

Elon Musk’s fierce reaction

Not accepting to have his reputation damaged, Elon Musk and his legal team sent an ultimatum demanding that The View correct and publicly apologize.

However, the program only gave a vague explanation, claiming that the statements were within the framework of “freedom of comment”.

In response, Musk officially sued The View and key MCs for compensation of up to 80 million USD, and at the same time requested a public apology on national television.

The court intervenes: Verdict and consequences

After many tense trials, the court issued a ruling forcing The View to broadcast an official apology to Elon Musk.

However, the request for financial compensation was not fully approved by the court, but only stopped at a symbolic level.

The View apologized on television, but many viewers commented that this apology was “insincere” and just a formality.

Elon Musk immediately posted on social network X (Twitter): “This is an important step forward in protecting personal honor from irresponsible media.

I hope this will be a lesson for other programs about transparency and fairness in speech.”

Public opinion is divided, experts speak out

The lawsuit has created a wave of fierce controversy.

A large part of the online community and Musk fans believe that this is a personal victory against the “careless” media, and at the same time congratulated this billionaire.

On the contrary, many journalists and media experts are concerned that this ruling will become a dangerous precedent, causing the press and talk shows to self-censor excessively and overshadowing the freedom of speech that is the foundation of a democratic society.

Harvard University media law expert, Prof.

Lisa Feldman commented: “The court has struck a balance between protecting personal honor and not stifling freedom of speech.

However, this case will certainly be brought up again whenever the media faces the delicate line between freedom and responsibility.”

Impact on the media industry and stakeholders

After the lawsuit, The View’s viewership dropped slightly, while major sponsors such as Procter & Gamble and General Motors temporarily suspended cooperation to “review media policies”.

Tesla and SpaceX stocks recovered slightly after Musk won the lawsuit, showing that investors’ confidence in his personal reputation is still quite high.

Freedom of speech organizations such as Freedom House and Reporters Without Borders have also warned: “If television programs fear being sued for every statement, the press will no longer be a voice of social criticism.

This could lead to a weak, lifeless media industry.

Significance and unanswered questions

The lawsuit between Elon Musk and The View is a wake-up call for both the media industry and public figures about controlling speech in the age of social media.

It raises big questions: Where is the line between freedom of speech and legal responsibility?

Do television programs still have the courage to criticize and question powerful individuals? And can celebrities use their financial power to “silence” the media?

In the context of information spreading at the speed of light, this lawsuit will certainly be mentioned as an important milestone in the history of modern media.