Elon Musk has called on his followers to “fight” five times since Charlie Kirk was killed.
Elon Musk in Morristown, N.J., in March.Brendan Smialowski / AFP – Getty Images file
Tech billionaire Elon Musk has rejected calls for national unity and has instead embraced increasingly inflammatory rhetoric in the days since conservative activist Charlie Kirk was killed.
Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has told his millions of online followers five times since Kirk’s death that they need to “fight or die” in what he describes as a deepening cultural and political conflict, even as most elected officials across the country have called for calm.
In addition to calling on his followers to fight, Musk has demanded the imprisonment of rapper Bobby Vylan for insulting Kirk after his death, called upon fellow tech executives to deplatform or fire other critics of Kirk and accused the media and educational institutions of “programming people to murder” — all part of a dark turn in Musk’s language since Kirk was shot.
Responding to the k:i;l;l:i:n:g, a strain of activists and commentators on the far right has pushed for civil war, mass arrests or other forms of retribution.
At the White House, deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller vowed vengeance Monday, and Musk, although he has been out of the White House since May, has pushed in the same direction.
Musk’s comments have come in posts on X, the social media app he owns, as well as in a livestreamed speech Saturday to a far-right rally in London.
In the speech, he said “violence is coming” and called for the dissolution of the British Parliament and new elections.
Experts have warned that hypertoxic and violent language can sometimes influence people offline, including by encouraging acts of vigilante violence against those seen as disloyal, although there have been no reports of further violence since Kirk’s k:i;l;l:i:n:g.
Musk didn’t immediately respond to a request for an interview Monday about his recent posts.
On Monday, the office of British Prime Minister Keir Starmer denounced Musk’s weekend speech, calling it “dangerous and inflammatory language” that threatened “violence and intimidation on our streets.”
Musk, as the owner of X and its most-followed account, has an enormous megaphone. He’s also the world’s wealthiest person, after Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison briefly unseated him last week.
Musk’s political future has been a question mark since he left the Trump administration more than three months ago, quitting his full-time role with President Donald Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency.
He has feuded off and on with Trump. And while he has at times said he plans to start his own political party in the United States, his language in the meantime has fixated on extreme ideas and civilizational conflict.
In the days before Kirk’s shooting, Musk had posted several times about changing racial demographics, expressing concern that there weren’t more white people around the world and about birth rates in majority-white countries.
“White people are a rapidly diminishing minority of global population,” Musk posted on Sept. 6. In a follow-up post, he added, “no one seems to care.”
Last month, Musk also urged people to “fight” in comments about immigration and cultural conflict in the United Kingdom and Ireland, where he has long pushed for a crackdown on refugees and migrants.
“It’s now or never. Fight, fight, fight!” he posted on Aug. 29. He followed up the next day with an additional thought: “Fight or die is what it comes down to.”
Musk has a record of using what experts call white supremacist dog whistles, such as predicting “civil war” in Europe over immigration, a prophecy that few believed at the time and that hasn’t come to pass.
He has also smeared Haitians as cannibals and stoked unfounded claims about a genocide of white people in his native South Africa.
Musk also embraced violent imagery when he was in government, wielding a literal chainsaw as his emblem for cutting government spending and regulations and boasting that he fed the U.S.
Agency for International Development “into the wood chipper.” The dismantling of USAID could lead to 14 million deaths over five years, according to one analysis.
But the shooting of Kirk on a Utah college campus Wednesday appeared to underscore for Musk what he views as an existential risk.
He has used a variation of the “fight or die” language five times since the shooting: four times on X, where he has 226 million followers, and again in his livestreamed speech to the London far-right rally.
It’s not always clear whom Musk believes he is fighting or whom he believes his followers should fight.
In one of the recent instances when he posted “fight or die,” Musk was responding to a pseudonymous account that had written about “fighting the woke mind virus.”
In another instance Saturday, Musk criticized a social media user who had endorsed violence.
That person had written on Facebook that members of the far right “deserve to die,” prompting Musk to comment Saturday on X, “We must fight back or be murdered.”
Musk seemed to rule out the possibility of national calm.
“Peace is not possible with people who revel in murder,” he posted Saturday.
The Kirk shooting has also prompted Musk to reverse his long-stated opposition to what conservatives have long derided as “cancel culture.”
In August 2023, Musk pledged on X to pay the legal bills for people who said they were unfairly treated by their employers for “posting or liking something on this platform,” but in the past several days he has urged severe consequences for anyone celebrating Kirk’s death.
On Friday, Musk pushed Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella to look into reports that some of his employees had been criticizing Kirk after his death.
Microsoft said later in the day on X: “Comments celebrating violence against anyone are unacceptable and do not align with our values.” A company spokesperson had no additional comment Monday.
On Saturday, Musk posted a list of people — including teachers and nurses — who, according to another user, had said “vile things” about Kirk’s death.
On Monday, Musk targeted Hasan Piker, a leftist streamer with 2.9 million followers on Twitch who has partly blamed Kirk for his own death.
Musk shared a complaint about Piker’s comments on X and publicly tagged Jeff Bezos, the Amazon founder and executive chair — who is relevant to the topic because Amazon owns Twitch, Piker’s preferred platform. Musk had earlier posted that Piker should be banned from Twitch.
A spokesperson for Amazon had no immediate comment Monday.
Musk separately endorsed a post from a member of Congress who said those celebrating Kirk’s death “must be thrown out of civil society.”
He shared the post with a “100” emoji.
News
🚨 BREAKING: Just minutes ago, Elon Musk stunned the sports world by announcing he has officially purchased the Dallas Cowboys for a jaw-dropping $7.5 billion 🏈💰. In a shocking twist, longtime owner Jerry Jones revealed he will be stepping away — and even leaving the United States — after cashing out in what may be the most dramatic move in NFL history. Musk, already the mastermind behind Tesla and SpaceX, now adds “NFL franchise owner” to his empire. Fans are divided: some are hopeful that Musk’s bold vision could rescue the Cowboys from years of inconsistency, while others fear the billionaire’s experimental style could turn “America’s Team” into a risky venture. No matter which side you’re on, one thing is certain: the Cowboys will never be the same again. The future of the NFL just changed in real time — and the world is watching|KF
7 MINUTES AGO: Elon Musk Buys the Dallas Cowboys for $7.5 Billion — Jerry Jones Leaves America The sports world…
💥 “DISNEY CUT HIM. AGAIN. JIMMY KIMMEL’S RESPONSE? A CBS MEGA-DEAL, AN ON-AIR MIC DROP, AND A PROMISE THAT SHOOK THE INDUSTRY TO ITS CORE 💣🎤” The stage went dark. The audience held its breath. Then Jimmy Kimmel, no longer tied down by Disney’s restrictions, delivered a line so sharp it split the late-night world in two. Cameras rolled, jaws dropped, and by the end of his fiery outburst, one truth was clear: this wasn’t the end — it was a revolution. Insiders reveal CBS wasted no time, securing Kimmel in a mega-deal that has already sent rival networks scrambling. Rumors swirl of a “first show” unlike anything TV has ever seen — cryptic, daring, and set to dismantle the old rules of late-night. Executives are panicking, fans are buzzing, and competitors are wondering whose chair will be pulled out next. Jimmy didn’t just survive being cut. He turned rejection into a weapon — and now, the entire industry is bracing for impact. 🔥 The question isn’t whether late-night will change. It’s who will survive the new era Jimmy just ignited|KF
“Disney & ABC can kiss my ass!” That was Jimmy Kimmel’s explosive declaration after being fired — again — from ABC,…
🔥🚀 ELON MUSK SHATTERS ALL RECORDS — Forbes CONFIRMS He’s Now the First Human in History Worth $500 BILLION 💰⚡ From launching rockets into space to reshaping the future of transportation, Elon Musk has never played small. But this time, he’s crossed a line no one thought possible — becoming the first person on Earth to officially reach a staggering $500 billion net worth. 🌍 Fans call it proof of genius. Critics call it proof of greed. Either way, Musk’s meteoric rise is rewriting the rules of money, power, and influence. With Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI all fueling his empire, the question isn’t how high he can go — it’s whether anyone can ever catch up. But behind the headlines lies a bigger debate: Should so much wealth be concentrated in one man’s hands? And what does Musk plan to do with it — save humanity or dominate it? 👉 The story isn’t just about money. It’s about ambition, control, and the thin line between vision and obsession. The world is watching… and the countdown has only just begun|KF|KF
Synopsis Elon Musk’s net worth surged to $500 billion, making him the first person in history to reach this milestone….
💥 “$50 MILLION LAWSUIT SHOCKER — John Roberts Takes Jimmy Kimmel to Court After Explosive On-Air Meltdown” 💥 What started as a seemingly harmless late-night segment has spiraled into one of the biggest media scandals of the year. In front of millions of viewers, Jimmy Kimmel blindsided television veteran John Roberts with a brutal attack — calling out his integrity, his work, and the very system he represents. The audience gasped, the cameras kept rolling, and the fallout has been nothing short of explosive. Now, Roberts is striking back with a massive $50 million lawsuit, accusing Kimmel of defamation and on-air assault that went far beyond comedy. Industry insiders say this case could reshape how late-night television handles interviews, pushing the boundaries between satire and slander. Fans are divided: some call Kimmel’s outburst “necessary truth-telling,” while others brand it reckless and cruel. Roberts, however, has made it clear — he’s not just defending his name, he’s defending the principles of journalism itself. 🔥 The courtroom battle is set to be as dramatic as the clash that started it all — and the world is watching every move|KF
What began as a routine late-night interview quickly spiraled into one of the most shocking confrontations in television history. Jimmy Kimmel went…
End of content
No more pages to load