The tragic death of conservative political activist Charlie Kirk has left countless questions unanswered, with many pointing fingers at those closest to him.

Among the most suspicious figures is none other than his chief of staff, Mikey McCoy, whose behavior immediately following the assassination has raised eyebrows across the political spectrum.

Adding fuel to the fire are conflicting statements made by Mikey’s father, a pastor, that directly contradict both the timeline of events and Mikey’s own actions.

The inconsistencies are glaring, and the deeper one digs, the more troubling the story becomes.

 

Charlie Kirk's Chief Of Staff & Father Caught Blatantly LYING! - YouTube

 

Mikey McCoy’s Suspicious Behavior

 

On the day of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Mikey McCoy’s behavior was, to put it mildly, bizarre.

Video footage clearly shows Mikey standing near Kirk moments before the fatal shot.

However, instead of reacting like most people would in such a situation—ducking, running for cover, or rushing to help the victim—Mikey picks up his phone and calmly walks away.

This all happens within milliseconds of the gunshot.

In the footage, Mikey can be seen lifting his phone to his ear and turning away from the scene.

He doesn’t even glance at Kirk, who is still falling to the ground. Instead, Mikey walks away slowly, almost robotically, as if he’s completely unfazed by the chaos erupting around him.

His demeanor is calm, calculated, and, frankly, unnerving.

What’s even more peculiar is that Mikey doesn’t appear to make any effort to call for medical assistance.

He doesn’t attempt to help Kirk or even check on his condition. Instead, he exits the scene entirely, leaving others to handle the aftermath.

This behavior has led many to question Mikey’s true role in the events of that day. Was he simply in shock, or did he know something the rest of us didn’t?

 

Who Was Mikey Calling?

 

According to the New York Times, Mikey McCoy’s first phone call after the shooting was to Erica Kirk, Charlie’s wife.

The report states that Erica was sitting in her mother’s hospital room when she received the call.

Mikey reportedly screamed, “He’s been shot!” into the phone. However, this timeline raises several questions.

The shooting occurred at 12:23 PM Mountain Time, which would have been 11:23 AM in Phoenix, where Erica was located.

If the New York Times is correct, Mikey called Erica immediately after the gunshot. But how could Mikey have known the extent of Kirk’s injuries so quickly?

He didn’t stay to assess the situation, and Kirk hadn’t even hit the ground by the time Mikey was on the phone.

This suggests that Mikey may have had prior knowledge of the attack or was receiving information from someone else.

Adding to the confusion is a statement from Mikey’s father, who claims that Mikey’s first call was to him, not Erica.

According to the pastor, Mikey called him and said, “Dad, Charlie’s been shot in the neck.

Please call every pastor and pray.” This directly contradicts the New York Times report and raises serious doubts about the credibility of both Mikey and his father.

 

The Blood Controversy

 

One of the most glaring inconsistencies in this case revolves around the issue of blood. Mikey’s father claimed that his son was “covered in blood” after the shooting.

However, video evidence tells a very different story. In the footage, Mikey is seen wearing a clean white shirt as he calmly walks away from the scene. There’s no blood on him whatsoever.

This discrepancy is significant because it suggests that either Mikey’s father is lying or he’s mistaken about what happened.

If Mikey wasn’t covered in blood, why would his father claim otherwise?

And if Mikey was covered in blood, how did it get there, considering he left the scene before Kirk’s body even hit the ground?

These questions remain unanswered, and the lack of clarity only adds to the suspicion surrounding Mikey and his family.

 

The Role of Israel

 

Another bizarre twist in this story involves a series of Google searches conducted in the months leading up to Kirk’s assassination.

According to independent investigators, someone in Israel searched for Mikey McCoy’s name and home address just days before the shooting.

This is particularly strange given that Kirk had recently hosted a Turning Point USA event where speakers criticized Israel’s policies. Could this be a coincidence, or is there a deeper connection?

Even more unsettling is the fact that these search records have reportedly been scrubbed from Google’s database.

Investigators claim that attempts to replicate the searches now yield no results, suggesting that someone may be trying to cover their tracks.

This raises serious questions about who was searching for Mikey McCoy and why.

 

The Lack of Accountability

 

What’s perhaps most troubling about this entire situation is the lack of accountability from those involved. Mikey McCoy has refused to answer questions about his actions on the day of the shooting.

Candace Owens, who reached out to Mikey for comment, received no response.

Meanwhile, prominent conservative figures like Donald Trump Jr., Kash Patel, and Megyn Kelly have remained silent on the matter, seemingly accepting the official narrative without question.

This silence is deafening, especially given the numerous inconsistencies and unanswered questions surrounding Kirk’s death.

Why isn’t anyone demanding answers from Mikey McCoy? Why hasn’t there been a thorough investigation into his actions? And why are so many people willing to accept a story that doesn’t add up?

 

The Timeline of Lies

 

When you piece together the timeline of events, the lies and contradictions become impossible to ignore.

Mikey McCoy’s immediate reaction to the shooting was suspicious, to say the least. His father’s statements only add to the confusion, as they directly contradict both the video evidence and the New York Times report.

And the strange Google searches from Israel raise even more questions about who might have been involved in Kirk’s assassination.

It’s clear that Mikey McCoy and his father are hiding something.

Whether it’s their own involvement in the attack or knowledge of who was behind it, their actions and statements don’t align with the facts.

The truth is out there, but it will take a thorough investigation to uncover it.

 

Final Thoughts

 

Charlie Kirk’s death was a tragedy, but the real tragedy is the lack of accountability and transparency in its aftermath.

Mikey McCoy’s suspicious behavior, his father’s conflicting statements, and the strange connection to Israel all point to a larger conspiracy.

Yet, those in power seem content to sweep these questions under the rug.

As more information comes to light, it’s crucial that we demand answers.

The inconsistencies in this case cannot be ignored, and the truth must be uncovered.

Charlie Kirk’s family, friends, and supporters deserve justice, and it’s up to us to ensure that they get it.