It was a moment no one in the room saw coming.

The Senate floor, often a stage for carefully rehearsed speeches and partisan theatrics, became the setting for something far more raw, far more urgent.

Senator Peter Welch, a Democrat from Vermont, rose to speak, and what followed was not just a critique of government overreach but a dismantling of the official narrative surrounding the ICE shootings of two American citizens.

His words carried the weight of truth, the kind that leaves no room for spin or excuses.

Welch began by acknowledging the pain and grief of his colleagues from Minnesota, Senators Tina Smith and Amy Klobuchar, who had been vocal about the tragedies that had unfolded in their state.

Their communities were reeling from the loss of two innocent lives, Renee Good and Alex Prey, both killed in shocking encounters with federal agents.

Welch, however, was not content to simply offer condolences.

He was there to demand accountability.

“This is shocking,” Welch said, his voice steady but filled with emotion.

“Two people got shot for no reason.

Absolutely no reason.”

The room fell silent as Welch recounted the details of Renee Good’s death.

A 37-year-old mother of three, she had been protesting peacefully when an ICE officer walked around her car, firing multiple shots through her windshield and then through her driver’s side window.

“This is absolutely terrifying,” Welch said, his voice rising slightly as he described the scene.

“That isn’t self-defense.

That sounds like an execution.”

The facts were chilling, and Welch laid them out with precision.

This wasn’t a chaotic shootout or a split-second decision made under duress.

This was a deliberate act, carried out by an agent of the federal government on an unarmed civilian.

Welch didn’t stop there.

He turned his attention to the second victim, Alex Prey, a bystander who had been filming the scene on his phone.

Prey, Welch explained, had intervened when he saw an ICE agent pushing a woman into a snowbank.

A scuffle ensued, and Prey was subdued by officers, disarmed, and held on the ground.

Despite being fully restrained and posing no threat, Prey was shot 10 times by two ICE agents.

“Let that sink in,” Welch said, his voice heavy with disbelief.

“Shot him 10 times.

This wasn’t a shootout with a cartel member.

This was an American citizen on American soil.”

The weight of his words hung in the air, forcing everyone in the room to confront the brutal reality of what had happened.

Welch’s outrage was palpable, but it was also grounded in principle.

He invoked the Fourth Amendment, which protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures, and questioned how a government that claims to uphold the Constitution could justify such actions.

“If the government can do this to a suburban mom, they can do it to anyone,” Welch warned.

The most damning part of Welch’s speech came when he turned his attention to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who had dismissed the victims as “domestic terrorists” without providing any evidence to support her claim.

Welch called out the cruelty and arrogance of this label, which he argued was being used as a shield to avoid accountability.

“Oh, we don’t have to explain why we shot him 10 times,” Welch said, his voice dripping with disdain.

“He was a terrorist.”

He wasn’t buying it, and he made it clear that no one else should either.

Welch demanded proof, but Noem had none.

Her refusal to take responsibility for the actions of her agency only deepened the sense of outrage.

“This is not acceptable to any one of us here,” Welch said, his voice rising.

“This is about seeing two innocent people shot, and they didn’t need to be.”

Welch’s speech wasn’t just a call for accountability—it was a call to action.

He criticized his colleagues for prioritizing procedural concerns over the lives of their constituents, pointing out the absurdity of delaying reforms because it would inconvenience members of the House.

“That’s called doing your job,” Welch said, his frustration evident.

“It’s called accountability.

It’s called taking responsibility.”

Welch also paid tribute to the people of Minnesota, who had taken to the streets in subzero temperatures to demand justice.

“They care about the right of assembly.

They care about the First Amendment.

They care about their constitutional rights.

But most of all, they care about each other,” he said.

The contrast between the courage of ordinary citizens and the cowardice of those in power was stark.

Welch didn’t mince words when describing Noem’s leadership.

He called her remarks dismissing the victims as domestic terrorists “cruel” and accused her of failing to accept even an inkling of responsibility for her role in overseeing an agency that had gone rogue.

“This is totally out of control,” Welch said.

His words were a direct indictment of not just Noem but the entire system that allowed such abuses to occur.

Welch also took aim at the broader implications of these shootings for law enforcement.

He acknowledged the difficult and often dangerous work that officers do but pointed out that the people most disgusted by these actions were other members of law enforcement.

“They know the job is hard,” Welch said.

“But they have accepted the responsibility to be a guardian, to be protective.”

Real law enforcement officers, Welch argued, don’t condone the kind of reckless violence displayed by ICE agents in Minnesota.

They understand that such actions erode public trust and make their jobs harder.

Welch’s speech was a masterclass in moral clarity and constitutional principle.

He didn’t rely on partisan attacks or political theater.

Instead, he appealed to the shared values that should unite all Americans: justice, accountability, and the rule of law.

“This is not a Republican-Democratic deal,” Welch said.

“This is about seeing two innocent people shot, and they didn’t need to be.”

His words were a reminder of the Senate’s responsibility to act as a check on executive power and to provide reassurance and safety to the people they represent.

Welch’s speech has already begun to resonate far beyond the Senate chamber.

It has sparked a national conversation about the militarization of federal agencies and the need for accountability at the highest levels of government.

It has also highlighted the cost of silence—the lives lost, the trust eroded, and the principles compromised when those in power refuse to act.

In the end, Welch’s message was clear: no excuses remain.

The facts are out in the open, and the time for action is now.

As he concluded his speech, Welch left the room with a challenge, not just for his colleagues but for the nation as a whole.

“We can accept our responsibility,” he said.

“We are the 100 people in this country who have the opportunity to provide some reassurance and safety and confidence to the people each and every one of us represents.

So yes, let’s do our job.”

The silence that followed was deafening.

In that moment, it became clear that Welch had done more than expose the truth—he had forced the nation to confront it.

And in doing so, he reminded everyone that silence is not an option when lives are at stake and justice is on the line.

⚠️IMPORTANTE – RECLAMI⚠️

Se desideri che i contenuti vengano rimossi, invia un’e-mail con il motivo a:
[email protected]

Avvertenza.
I video potrebbero contenere informazioni che non devono essere considerate fatti assoluti, ma teorie, supposizioni, voci e informazioni trovate online. Questi contenuti potrebbero includere voci, pettegolezzi, esagerazioni o informazioni inaccurate. Gli spettatori sono invitati a effettuare le proprie ricerche prima di formulare un’opinione. I contenuti potrebbero essere soggettivi.