It didn’t unravel with anger or spectacle, but with paperwork placed calmly on the table.

Each log narrowed the options, each image tightened the frame.

What began as a routine exchange shifted into something far more uncomfortable as explanations lost traction.

The pauses grew longer.

The tone changed.

In that quiet, the difference between public duty and private indulgence became impossible to ignore.

No confrontation was needed.

The evidence carried the weight, and the room understood exactly where the story had ended.

Senator Peter Welch, a Democrat from Vermont, isn’t often the one to dominate headlines.

Known for his measured tone and a reputation for being a team player, Welch has rarely been the source of viral moments.

But during a recent Senate hearing, the veteran senator proved that he could bring the heat when the moment called for it.

And Kash Patel, the FBI Director, found himself squarely in Welch’s crosshairs.

The hearing began predictably enough, with Patel fielding questions about the FBI’s handling of recent incidents.

Welch started by addressing a premature announcement Patel had made regarding the apprehension of a suspect in a high-profile case.

Patel had gone on record stating, “We got our man,” only for it to be revealed later that the individual in custody was not the perpetrator.

Welch pressed Patel on this, pointing out the recklessness of such a statement, which could have misled the public and hindered the investigation.

Patel attempted to explain it away as a matter of “working with the public” and claimed it wasn’t a mistake.

But Welch wasn’t buying it.

“If you put out a statement that says, ‘We’ve got our man,’ and it turns out that you didn’t have your man, that’s not a mistake?” Welch asked pointedly.

Patel doubled down, insisting that his statement was justified.

But the damage was done.

Welch had already exposed a pattern of carelessness and arrogance in Patel’s leadership.

And then, Welch pivoted.

The real fireworks were about to begin.

The Vermont senator shifted his focus to the firing of Brian Driscoll, a decorated FBI agent with an impeccable record.

Welch meticulously laid out Driscoll’s credentials: 18 years of service, commander of the FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team, and recipient of the Medal of Valor for his role in a raid on an ISIS terrorist who had kidnapped American citizens.

Driscoll, Welch noted, had been terminated after raising concerns about the treatment of FBI agents who had investigated the January 6th insurrection.

Welch’s voice grew sharper as he pressed Patel on the decision to fire Driscoll.

“Do you agree with me that a boss who stands up for his subordinates when they did the job that was asked of them is a stand-up person and somebody to be admired?” Welch asked.

“Generally speaking, yes, sir,” Patel replied cautiously.

But when Welch asked Patel to confirm that he had personally communicated Driscoll’s termination, Patel admitted, “Yes.

He was terminated.

That was my job.”

Welch didn’t let up.

He painted a picture of a man who had dedicated his career to protecting Americans, only to be cast aside for doing his job.

“You’re telling me there’s ‘other information’ that justifies firing someone with an absolutely outstanding record?” Welch asked.

Patel, clearly uncomfortable, repeated that the matter was under litigation and refused to elaborate further.

But the damage was done.

Welch had successfully framed the termination as a political decision, one that punished a hero for standing up for his team.

Then came the moment that froze the room.

Welch turned to Patel’s use of government private jets, a topic that had already drawn criticism from both sides of the aisle.

Patel had previously criticized his predecessor, Christopher Wray, for using FBI jets for personal travel.

But Welch had receipts.

“On the weekend of March 7th, an FBI plane flew round trip from DC to Las Vegas, and you attended a UFC fight with Mel Gibson,” Welch said, holding up a photo.

“Is that you?

And is that true?”

Patel, caught off guard, tried to deflect.

“I live in Las Vegas.

I’m allowed to go home.

I didn’t leave a congressional hearing early on an FBI jet to dodge questions,” he replied.

The deflection fell flat.

Welch wasn’t accusing Patel of going home—he was accusing him of using taxpayer dollars to attend a high-profile sporting event with a Hollywood celebrity.

The optics were terrible, and Patel’s attempt to spin the situation only made it worse.

Welch pressed on.

“On April 5th, you attended a hockey game in New York City.

You don’t live there, right?”

“No, I don’t,” Patel admitted.

“And on April 12th, you attended a UFC fight in Miami, also on the FBI jet, right?” Welch continued.

“That’s correct,” Patel replied.

Welch’s questioning was relentless.

“So what’s the cost to the taxpayer for those three flights?” he asked.

Patel dodged, claiming he paid the “commercial equivalent” for his travel.

But Welch wasn’t satisfied.

He pointed out that everyday FBI agents stationed in Washington don’t get to fly home on private jets.

Patel’s defense?

Congress mandated the use of private jets for security reasons.

Welch wasn’t buying it.

“We didn’t make it mandatory that you go to UFC games with Mel Gibson,” he shot back.

The room froze.

Patel, visibly flustered, tried to argue that he was simply going home.

But Welch’s point was clear: the jet is for official business, not for rubbing elbows with celebrities at high-profile events.

Welch brought it all home with a devastating conclusion.

While the FBI was requesting an $80 million upgrade for a new private jet, local law enforcement across the country was facing budget cuts.

Welch pointed out that Vermont’s police departments had lost $500 million in COPS grants, funding that is critical for supporting local law enforcement.

“How in the world can we justify cutting grants for local police while asking for an $80 million private jet?” Welch asked.

Patel denied the $80 million figure but failed to provide an alternative number.

The contrast was stark.

On one hand, local police were struggling to make ends meet.

On the other, the FBI was using taxpayer dollars to fly its director to UFC fights and hockey games.

Welch’s performance was a masterclass in accountability.

He didn’t rely on theatrics or personal attacks.

He let the evidence speak for itself, laying out flight logs, photos, and costs in a way that left Patel with no room to spin.

The result was a devastating indictment of government waste and privilege, one that resonated far beyond the hearing room.

In the end, Welch reminded everyone why oversight matters.

It’s not about scoring political points.

It’s about ensuring that public servants are held to the same standards as the people they serve.

And in this case, Welch made it clear that those standards had been violated.

The room froze.

The excuses thinned.

And Kash Patel ran out of room to spin.

⚠️IMPORTANTE – RECLAMI⚠️

Se desideri che i contenuti vengano rimossi, invia un’e-mail con il motivo a:
[email protected]

Avvertenza.
I video potrebbero contenere informazioni che non devono essere considerate fatti assoluti, ma teorie, supposizioni, voci e informazioni trovate online. Questi contenuti potrebbero includere voci, pettegolezzi, esagerazioni o informazioni inaccurate. Gli spettatori sono invitati a effettuare le proprie ricerche prima di formulare un’opinione. I contenuti potrebbero essere soggettivi.